On this page
Quick answer
The Leaning Tower of Pisa leans because the ground under it gave way: Tuscany's tourism site says the subsidence began early in construction, which started in August 1173, and that the tilt began by the third storey. In 1990 the Italian government appointed an international committee to stabilise it. According to a 2009 paper by three geotechnical engineers, John Burland among them, the committee first placed lead weights on the north side of the foundation, then removed small volumes of soil from beneath the north side, rotating the tower back by about half a degree by June 2001. Imperial College's consultancy arm gives the result as 45 centimetres of straightening.
The short answer
The tower leans because the ground under it gave way while it was being built. Tuscany's tourism site attributes its inclination of about four degrees to subsidence of the ground beneath it that began in the early phases of construction.[1] It is the bell tower of Pisa's cathedral and one of the four monuments of the Piazza dei Miracoli, as a 2009 engineering paper on the tower puts it.[3] The square, under its formal name Piazza del Duomo, was inscribed on the World Heritage List in 1987.[2]
Tuscany's tourism site dates the start of construction to August 1173 and says the tilt began as early as the third storey, after which the builders carried on in the opposite direction to the lean. The same page says building went on, with two long interruptions, for about two hundred years.[1]
The sources do not agree on exactly when the lean began. Against the tourism site's third storey, the 2009 engineering paper says the tower started leaning southwards during the second construction stage, and Imperial College's consultancy arm says it first tilted in 1173, when the second floor was built.[5][3] XTOUR reports the three accounts as their sources give them.
Who built it
Tuscany's tourism site names three people. It attributes the founding of the building as a whole to Bonanno Pisano, the author also of the cathedral's bronze doors, and says the original design is presumed to be by Diotisalvi, who was building the baptistery at the time. The same page gives the bell chamber, on the seventh ring, to Giovanni di Simone in the fourteenth century.[1] XTOUR reports the Diotisalvi attribution as the site's presumption, not as a settled fact.
Why it kept leaning
The 2009 paper by John Burland, Michele Jamiolkowski and Carlo Viggiani, three geotechnical engineers, describes the tower's motion as "leaning instability": at a critical height, the overturning moment produced by a small increase in tilt equals or exceeds the resisting moment the foundation can supply. The same paper says that in 1990 the tilt was increasing by about six arc seconds a year, and that, besides creep, the most likely cause of the tower's progressive seasonal rotation was a groundwater level that fluctuated with the heavy rainstorms of September to December.[3]
The 1990 to 2001 rescue
In 1990 the Italian government appointed an international committee for the safeguard and stabilisation of the tower.[3] The authors' 2003 paper describes it as a multidisciplinary body of experts in art, restoration and materials alongside structural and geotechnical engineers.[4] Imperial College's consultancy arm says Burland was selected by the Italian government as part of a 14-strong committee.[5]
The first step was temporary. The 2009 paper says that in the second half of 1993, 600 tonnes of lead weights were placed on the north side of the foundation through a removable post-tensioned concrete ring, reducing the overturning moment by about ten per cent, and that the load was raised to 900 tonnes in September 1995.[3]
The lasting fix was underexcavation. According to the 2003 paper's abstract, after weighing several approaches the committee chose to remove small volumes of soil from beneath the north side of the foundation in a controlled way, and did so between 1999 and 2001.[4] The 2009 paper describes the extraction tubes installed just beneath the north side, the start of full underexcavation in February 2000 and the final extraction on 6 June 2001.[3]
How much it moved
The engineers' paper gives the correction as an angle. By the final extraction the tower had been rotated northwards by about 1,800 arc seconds, the half a degree the committee had aimed for, and with later drainage works the reduction reached 1,880 arc seconds by mid-2002, about ten per cent of the tilt at its 1993 maximum.[3] Imperial College's consultancy arm gives the result as a straightening of 45 centimetres, after 38 cubic metres of soil had been removed.[5] The two figures measure different things, an angle at the foundation and a distance, so XTOUR reports each as its source states it.
The sources also differ on when the tower reopened. The 2009 paper says it reopened to the public in December 2001 after being closed since early 1990, while Tuscany's tourism site says it reopened in the summer of 2001.[1][3] XTOUR has read both and does not choose between them.
What XTOUR does not tell you
This explainer covers the tower's engineering history, not a visit. XTOUR does not publish ticket rules, age limits, climbing conditions or opening hours for the tower; the Opera della Primaziale Pisana publishes ticket and opening-time pages on its own site.[6] The guide to Pisa's Piazza del Duomo sets out what those pages say. For Pisa as a place, see the Pisa destination page and the guide to choosing between Florence, Pisa and Siena.
Sources & references
- [1]Visit Tuscany (Tuscany's regional tourism site), 'Torre Pendente di Pisa' (Italian page): the campanile of the cathedral of Santa Maria Assunta; inclination of about 4 degrees, due to subsidence of the ground that began in the early phases of construction; construction began in August 1173 and continued, with two long interruptions, for about two hundred years; the tilt began at the third storey and construction continued in the opposite direction; three people named: the founding of the building as a whole attributed to Bonanno Pisano, author also of the cathedral's bronze doors, the original design presumed to be by Diotisalvi, and the bell chamber on the seventh ring by Giovanni di Simone, fourteenth century; reopened to the public in summer 2001. Read 2026-10-09
- [2]UNESCO World Heritage Committee decision 11 COM VII.A (1987), 'Inscription: Piazza del Duomo, Pisa (Italy)', property 395. Read 2026-10-09
- [3]Burland, Jamiolkowski and Viggiani (2009), 'Leaning Tower of Pisa: Behaviour after Stabilization Operations', International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories 1(3), 156-169 (ISSMGE journal; its About page says accepted papers are published once the reviewers' recommended modifications are made), full text (PDF) read: the authors are professors of geotechnical engineering at Imperial College London, Turin and Naples; the bell tower of the cathedral, one of four monuments in the Piazza dei Miracoli; construction began 1173; the tower began leaning southwards during the second construction stage; 'leaning instability' (after Hambly); in 1990 the tilt increased by about 6 arc seconds a year; besides creep, the most likely cause of the progressive seasonal rotation was a fluctuating groundwater level due to heavy rainstorms between September and December; in 1990 the Italian Government appointed a multidisciplinary International Committee for the safeguard and stabilisation of the tower; 600 t of lead weights on the north side via a removable post-tensioned concrete ring in the second half of 1993, reducing the overturning moment by about ten per cent, raised to 900 t in September 1995; a permanent reduction in inclination of half a degree sought; other methods investigated before underexcavation; soil extraction tubes adjacent to and just beneath the north side; full underexcavation began 21 February 2000; final extraction 6 June 2001 with about 1800 arc seconds of northward rotation; 1880 arc seconds by mid-2002, about 10% of the 1993 maximum; closed early 1990, reopened December 2001. Read 2026-10-09
- [4]Burland, Jamiolkowski and Viggiani (2003), 'The stabilisation of the Leaning Tower of Pisa', Soils and Foundations 43(5), 63-80 (Japanese Geotechnical Society), abstract on J-STAGE: the 1990 International Committee was a multidisciplinary body of experts in arts, restoration and materials, structural engineers and geotechnical engineers; after considering a number of approaches it adopted controlled removal of small volumes of soil from beneath the north side of the foundation (underexcavation), carried out 1999-2001. Abstract read 2026-10-09; the full-text PDF is a scan without a text layer and was not read
- [5]Imperial Consultants (Imperial College London's consultancy), case study 'Stabilising the Leaning Tower of Pisa': Emeritus Professor John Burland was selected by the Italian Government as part of a 14-strong rescue committee, which intervened in 1990; over 11 years the committee removed 38 cubic metres of soil from beneath the raised side, straightening the tower back by 45 cm to a position last seen in 1838; the page also says the tower first acquired its tilt in 1173, when the second floor was constructed. Read 2026-10-09
- [6]Opera della Primaziale Pisana (opapisa.it), English home page: oversees the monuments of Pisa's Piazza del Duomo; the site carries ticket, price and opening-time pages and online purchase. Read 2026-10-09
Frequently asked questions
Good to know
Was the tower designed to lean?
No. Tuscany's tourism site says the lean is due to subsidence of the ground beneath it that began in the early phases of construction, and that once the tilt had started the builders continued in the opposite direction to the lean.
Who built the tower?
Tuscany's tourism site names three people. It attributes the founding of the building as a whole to Bonanno Pisano, also the author of the bronze doors of Pisa's cathedral, says the original design is presumed to be by Diotisalvi, who was then building the baptistery, and gives the bell chamber on the seventh ring to Giovanni di Simone in the fourteenth century. XTOUR reports the Diotisalvi attribution as the site's presumption, not as a settled fact.